Mailkoo vs MailerLite
An honest look at where Mailkoo fits, and where MailerLite is still the better answer.
| Mailkoo | MailerLite | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing basis | Priced by plan limits and sending credits. | Priced by number of subscribers. |
| Sending infrastructure | Nine providers, or your own SMTP server. | Their own sending infrastructure. |
| Your data | Full export any time, REST API and webhooks. | Export supported; sending stays on their platform. |
How Mailkoo is different
The four things that actually change when you move.
Bring your own sending provider
Connect Amazon SES, SendGrid, Mailgun, SparkPost, Elastic Email or your own SMTP server. You keep the sending relationship, the reputation and the per-email cost.
Priced on what you use
Plans are built from real limits — contacts, campaigns, automations, sending credits — not from a contact-count ladder that charges you more for subscribers you never email.
Deliverability tooling included
DKIM and SPF verification, custom tracking domains, warmup schedules, bounce and feedback-loop handling are part of the product, not a higher tier or a separate vendor.
Your data stays portable
Full list export at any time, an open REST API, webhooks, and no lock-in on your templates or your data. If you leave, you take everything with you.
Where MailerLite wins
MailerLite is cheaper than most at small list sizes and its editor is exceptionally easy to hand to a non-technical colleague. For a simple newsletter under a few thousand subscribers, the extra control we offer may be control you do not need.
If you send a modest volume and want the simplest possible editor, MailerLite does that job well.
Switching across
- 1 Export your subscribers and connect your sending provider — the DNS records to publish are shown for you.
- 2 Import your lists, rebuild your automations from the templates, and send a warmup schedule to the new domain.
- 3 Run both in parallel for one campaign, compare the numbers, and switch the rest when you are satisfied.